[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15288022#comment-15288022
]
Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-3721:
------------------------------------
Btw, I think it's fine to name it KAFKA_0_10_0 now. My point was related to
Becket's question: "In the future do we always create a new Object and name it
without "IV" suffix even if there is no change compared with the previous
ApiVersion?".
> UpdateMetadataRequest V2 should be in API version 0.10.0-IV1
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-3721
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3721
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jiangjie Qin
> Assignee: Jiangjie Qin
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.10.0.0
>
>
> When we introduce UpdateMetadataRequest V2 in KAFKA-1215, we did not
> introduce a new API Version 0.10.0-IV1 but reused 0.10.0-IV0. This causes
> problem for people who are running off the trunk and using message format
> 0.10.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
