Sure, done. Ismael
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Ismael, > > I probably replied too late, but is it possible to add KIP-79 to the agenda > as well? > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:57 AM, radai <radai.rosenbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to discuss KIP-72. could you please add me? > > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > Hi Vahid, > > > > > > Sounds good. Jun is unavailable on the day, so I'll send the invite. > Any > > > other KIPs that people would like to discuss on the day (Tuesday at > 11am > > > PT)? The following KIPs are under discussion and have either been > > submitted > > > or updated recently: > > > > > > KIP-68: Add a consumed log retention before log retention > > > KIP-72: Allow Sizing Incoming Request Queue in Bytes > > > KIP-79: ListOffsetRequest/ListOffsetResponse v1 and add timestamp > search > > > methods to the new consumer > > > > > > If the authors of any KIPs are available and interested to discuss them > > on > > > the next KIP call, please let me know so that I can add them to the > > agenda. > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Vahid S Hashemian < > > > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'd like to add KIP-54 to the agenda for next KIP meeting. > > > > This KIP has been in discussion phase for a long time, and it would > be > > > > nice to have an online discussion about it, collect additional > > feedback, > > > > and move forward, if possible. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > --Vahid > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
