+1

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:

> Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding).
>
> Ismael
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Tom Crayford <tcrayf...@heroku.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Apurva Mehta <apu...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1. Thanks for the KIP!
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Xavier Léauté <
> xav...@confluent.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Based on the feedback KIP-96 seems pretty uncontroversial, so I'd
> > > like
> > > > to
> > > > > > initiate a vote on it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 96+-+Add+per+partition+metrics+for+in-sync+and+
> > assigned+replica+count
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Xavier
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Gwen Shapira
> > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to