+1

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Sriram Subramanian <r...@confluent.io> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Ian Wrigley <i...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me too. When I talk to people in training classes, who are
> > typically much newer to Kafka, they tend to be surprised (and
> > scared/horrified) that the default is true. Much safer to set it to false
> > and let people change it when they really understand the tradeoffs.
> >
> > Ian.
> >
> > ---
> > Ian Wrigley
> > Director, Education Services
> > Confluent, Inc
> >
> > > On Jan 3, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Tom Crayford <tcrayf...@heroku.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1. We've been running it in production for a long time and it's the
> > right
> > > default.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks for the KIP, +1 from me.
> > >>
> > >> Ismael
> > >>
> > >> On 3 Jan 2017 6:54 pm, "Ben Stopford" <b...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi All
> > >>>
> > >>> Please find the below KIP which proposes changing the setting
> > >>> unclean.leader.election.enabled from true to false. The motivation
> for
> > >>> this change is that it catches out new Kafka users who don’t realise
> > the
> > >>> default favours availability over data loss.
> > >>>
> > >>> This would mean clusters wishing to continue with unclean leader
> > election
> > >>> enabled would need to add the appropriate configuration on upgrade.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please let me know if you foresee any issue with this change, agree
> or
> > >>> don’t agree.
> > >>>
> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/%
> > >>> 5BWIP%5D+KIP-106+-+Change+Default+unclean.leader.
> > >>> election.enabled+from+True+to+False <https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > >>> confluence/display/KAFKA/[WIP]+KIP-106+-+Change+Default+
> > >>> unclean.leader.election.enabled+from+True+to+False>
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks
> > >>>
> > >>> B
> > >>>
> > >>> Ben Stopford
> > >>> Confluent, http://www.confluent.io <http://www.confluent.io/>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to