+1 as well. On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1. This is a good idea as we have a lot of KIPs in flight. > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:53 AM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > A while back Grant proposed moving inactive/dormant KIPs to a separate > > table in the wiki. I think this is a good idea as it will make it easier > > for people to see the KIPs that are actually active. The list that Grant > > proposed then was: > > > > - KIP-6 - New reassignment partition logic for rebalancing (dormant) > > > - KIP-14 - Tools standardization (dormant) > > > - KIP-17 - Add HighwaterMarkOffset to OffsetFetchResponse (dormant) > > > - KIP-18 - JBOD Support (dormant) > > > - KIP-23 - Add JSON/CSV output and looping options to > > ConsumerGroupCommand > > > (dormant) > > > - KIP-27 - Conditional Publish (dormant) > > > - KIP-30 - Allow for brokers to have plug-able consensus and meta data > > storage > > > sub systems (dormant) > > > - KIP-39: Pinning controller to broker (dormant) > > > - KIP-44 - Allow Kafka to have a customized security protocol > (dormant) > > > - KIP-46 - Self Healing (dormant) > > > - KIP-47 - Add timestamp-based log deletion policy (blocked - by > KIP-33) > > > - KIP-53 - Add custom policies for reconnect attempts to > NetworkdClient > > > - KIP-58 - Make Log Compaction Point Configurable (blocked - by > KIP-33) > > > - KIP-61: Add a log retention parameter for maximum disk space usage > > > percentage (dormant) > > > - KIP-68 Add a consumed log retention before log retention (dormant) > > > > > > KIP-58 was adopted since then and it probably makes sense to add KIP-10 > to > > the list. > > > > Are people OK with this? Feel free to suggest KIPs that should or should > > not be in the inactive/dormant list. > > > > Ismael > > > -- > Thanks, > Neha > -- -- Guozhang
