Hi Ismael, Sure, that sounds good to me. Thanks.
--Vahid From: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> To: dev@kafka.apache.org Date: 01/10/2017 03:26 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-109: Old Consumer Deprecation Sent by: isma...@gmail.com Thanks Vahid. I think there are 2 aspects to this KIP: 1. Deprecating the old consumers 2. When it should be done I think everyone agrees that we should deprecate it, but there is a difference of opinions on the timing. I think it may be best not to rush it, so I'm +1 on this for the release after 0.10.2.0 (which means the PR could be merged after the 0.10.2 branch is created in a couple of weeks). Ismael On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Vahid S Hashemian <vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com > wrote: > Happy Monday, > > I'd like to thank everyone who participated in the discussion around this > KIP and shared their opinion. > > The only concern that was raised was not having a defined migration plan > yet for existing users of the old consumer. > I hope that responses to this concern (on the discussion thread) have been > satisfactory. > > Given the short time we have until the 0.10.2.0 cut-off date I'd like to > start voting on this KIP. > > KIP: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-109%3A+Old+Consumer+ > Deprecation > Discussion thread: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg63427.html > > Thanks. > --Vahid > > >
