[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15822837#comment-15822837
 ] 

Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-4125:
--------------------------------------

Thanks for bringing this up [~mjsax]. I do agree that we have multiple API 
discussions spread in different places now. Maybe you can create a wiki in AK 
summarizing all those proposals and we can then discuss them together and 
perhaps propose a single KIP wrapping them all? Current ones I can think of are:

1. Rich functions.
2. Add {{key}} to {{mapValues}} / {{transformValues}}.
3. Add {{flatTransform}} and {{flatTransformValues}}.
4. Separate {{RecordContext}} from {{ProcessorContext}}.
5. Deprecate not user-facing functions from {{TopologyBuilder}}.
6. Remove {{loggingEnabled}} parameter in {{ProcessorContext.register}}.
7. Remove {{disableLogging}} from {{Stores}}.


> Provide low-level Processor API meta data in DSL layer
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-4125
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4125
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Matthias J. Sax
>            Assignee: Bill Bejeck
>            Priority: Minor
>
> For Processor API, user can get meta data like record offset, timestamp etc 
> via the provided {{Context}} object. It might be useful to allow uses to 
> access this information in DSL layer, too.
> The idea would be, to do it "the Flink way", ie, by providing
> RichFunctions; {{mapValue()}} for example.
> Is takes a {{ValueMapper<V1, V2>}} that only has method
> {noformat}
> V2 apply(V1 value);
> {noformat}
> Thus, you cannot get any meta data within apply (it's completely "blind").
> We would add two more interfaces: {{RichFunction}} with a method
> {{open(Context context)}} and
> {noformat}
> RichValueMapper<V1, V2> extends ValueMapper<V1, V2>, RichFunction
> {noformat}
> This way, the user can chose to implement Rich- or Standard-function and
> we do not need to change existing APIs. Both can be handed into
> {{KStream.mapValues()}} for example. Internally, we check if a Rich
> function is provided, and if yes, hand in the {{Context}} object once, to
> make it available to the user who can now access it within {{apply()}} -- or
> course, the user must set a member variable in {{open()}} to hold the
> reference to the Context object.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to