Hey Jun, Do you have time to review the KIP again or vote for it?
Hey Ewen, Can you also review the KIP again or vote for it? I have discussed with Radai and Becket regarding your concern. We still think putting it in Admin Client seems more intuitive because there is use-case where application which manages topic or produces data may also want to purge data. It seems weird if they need to create a consumer to do this. Thanks, Dong On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Mayuresh Gharat <gharatmayures...@gmail.com > wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > > Mayuresh > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Dong Lin <lindon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sorry for the duplicated email. It seems that gmail will put the voting > > email in this thread if I simply replace DISCUSS with VOTE in the > subject. > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Dong Lin <lindon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > It seems that there is no further concern with the KIP-107. At this > point > > > we would like to start the voting process. The KIP can be found at > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-107 > > > %3A+Add+purgeDataBefore%28%29+API+in+AdminClient. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Dong > > > > > > > > > -- > -Regards, > Mayuresh R. Gharat > (862) 250-7125 >
