[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Armin Braun updated KAFKA-4765:
-------------------------------
    Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducerTest#testConstructorFailureCloseResource
>  and Similar Tests are Failing on some Systems (127.0.53.53 Collision Warning)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-4765
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4765
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: unit tests
>    Affects Versions: 0.10.1.1
>         Environment: All DNS environments that properly forward 127.0.53.53
>            Reporter: Armin Braun
>
> The test
> {code}
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducerTest#testConstructorFailureCloseResource
> {code}
> fails on some systems because this below snippet from 
> {code}
> org.apache.kafka.clients.ClientUtils#parseAndValidateAddresses
> {code}
> {code}
>                     InetSocketAddress address = new InetSocketAddress(host, 
> port);
>                     if (address.isUnresolved()) {
>                         log.warn("Removing server {} from {} as DNS 
> resolution failed for {}", url, CommonClientConfigs.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS_CONFIG, 
> host);
>                     } else {
>                         addresses.add(address);
>                     }
> {code}
> will add the address *some.invalid.hostname.foo.bar* to the addresses list 
> without error since it is resolved to *127.0.53.53* to indicate potential 
> future collision of the _.bar_ tld.
> The same issue applies to a few other test cases that try to intentionally 
> run into broken hostnames.
> This can (and should) be fixed by using broken hostname examples that do not 
> collide. I would suggest just putting a ".local" suffix on all that are 
> currently affected by this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to