This is definitely a major release, looks already quite exciting...
I don't want to start a bike-shading argument, but a few people have told
me in the past year that once exactly-once delivery lands, Kafka would
likely bump to 1.0. I do like it, but don't feel strongly either way.

Ofir Manor

Co-Founder & CTO | Equalum

Mobile: +972-54-7801286 | Email: ofir.ma...@equalum.io

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:

> Hi Vahid,
>
> Sure, I've added KIP-54. I thought I had done it, sorry for the oversight.
>
> Ismael
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Vahid S Hashemian <
> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 on 0.11.0.0.
> >
> > Can we also include KIP-54 to the list?
> > The PR for this KIP is ready for review.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --Vahid
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:   Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> > To:     dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date:   02/27/2017 07:47 PM
> > Subject:        [DISCUSS] 0.10.3.0/0.11.0.0 release planning
> > Sent by:        isma...@gmail.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I would like to volunteer to be the release
> > manager for our next time-based release. See https://cwiki.apache.org/c
> > onfluence/display/KAFKA/Time+Based+Release+Plan if you missed previous
> > communication on time-based releases or need a reminder.
> >
> > I put together a draft release plan with June 2017 as the release month
> > (as
> > previously agreed) and a list of KIPs that have already been voted:
> >
> > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> action?pageId=68716876
> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> action?pageId=68716876
> > >*
> >
> > I haven't set exact dates for the various stages (feature freeze, code
> > freeze, etc.) for now as Ewen is going to send out an email with some
> > suggested tweaks based on his experience as release manager for 0.10.2.0.
> > We can set the exact dates after that discussion.
> >
> > As we are starting the process early this time, we should expect the
> > number
> > of KIPs in the plan to grow (so don't worry if your KIP is not there
> yet),
> > but it's good to see that we already have 10 (including 2 merged and 2
> > with
> > PR reviews in progress).
> >
> > Out of the KIPs listed, KIP-98 (Exactly-once and Transactions) and
> KIP-101
> > (Leader Generation in Replication) require message format changes, which
> > typically imply a major version bump (i.e. 0.11.0.0). If we do that, then
> > it makes sense to also include KIP-106 (Unclean leader election should be
> > false by default) and KIP-118 (Drop support for Java 7). We would also
> > take
> > the chance to remove deprecated code, in that case.
> >
> > Given the above, how do people feel about 0.11.0.0 as the next Kafka
> > version? Please share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ismael
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to