Me too. +1.
   
 
 --
 
 
 
 
Dongjin Lee
 
 
 

   
Software developer in Line+.
 
So interested in massive-scale machine learning.
 
 

 facebook:   www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr 
(http://www.facebook.com/dongjin.lee.kr)  
 
linkedin:   kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr 
(http://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr)
 
 
github:   (http://goog_969573159/)github.com/dongjinleekr 
(http://github.com/dongjinleekr)
 
twitter:   www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr (http://www.twitter.com/dongjinleekr)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
>  
> On Mar 8, 2017 at 3:45 PM,  <Sriram Subramanian (mailto:r...@confluent.io)>  
> wrote:
>  
>  
>  
>  +1. Looks good 
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava  <e...@confluent.io>  
> wrote: 
>
> >  Hah, I forgot to do it in the original email, but I suppose I should make 
> >  it explicit: +1 (binding) 
> >  
> >  -Ewen 
> >  
> >  On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Gwen Shapira  <g...@confluent.io>  wrote: 
> >  
> >   >  +1 (binding) 
> >   >  
> >   >  On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava  
> > <e...@confluent.io 
> >   >  
> >   >  wrote: 
> >   >  
> >   >   >  Hi all, 
> >   >   >  
> >   >   >  I'd like to kick off voting for KIP-128: Add ByteArrayConverter 
> > for 
> >  Kafka 
> >   >   >  Connect: 
> >   >   >  
> >   >   >  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- 
> >   >   >  128%3A+Add+ByteArrayConverter+for+Kafka+Connect 
> >   >   >  
> >   >   >  There was a small amount of discussion, see the original thread 
> > here: 
> >   >   >  
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/62fc2245285ac5d15ebb9b2ebed672 
> >   >   >  b51e391c8dfe9a51be85f685f3@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E 
> >   >   >  
> >   >   >  The vote will stay open for at least 72 hours. 
> >   >   >  
> >   >   >  -Ewen 
> >   >   >  
> >   >  
> >   >  
> >   >  
> >   >  -- 
> >   >  *Gwen Shapira* 
> >   >  Product Manager | Confluent 
> >   >  650.450.2760 | @gwenshap 
> >   >  Follow us: Twitter  <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc>  | blog 
> >   >   <http://www.confluent.io/blog>  
> >   >  
> >  
>          

Reply via email to