Hi, Xavier, I think the per topic metric is more useful for measuring the traffic from the clients. For internal replication, perhaps the aggregate value is enough.
Thanks, Jun On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Xavier Léauté <[email protected]> wrote: > Any reason we are not keeping the per-topic breakdown for inter-broker > traffic? > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:52 PM Onur Karaman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Looks good. Thanks! > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Roger Hoover <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Very helpful. Thank you, Jun. > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Guozhang Wang <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Jun, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, LGTM. > > > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Ismael Juma <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Jun, looks good to me. > > > > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Ismael, > > > > > > > > > > > > Good point. Updated the KIP with ReplicationBytesInPerSec. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Ismael Juma <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Jun. Good to fix this inconsistency. Do I > > > > > understand > > > > > > > correctly that we are introducing ReplicationBytesOutPerSec, > but > > > not > > > > > > > ReplicationBytesInPerSec? > > > > > > > If so, what's the reason? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We created "KIP-153 : Include only client traffic in > > > BytesOutPerSec > > > > > > > > metric". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > > > > > 153+%3A+Include+only+client+traffic+in+BytesOutPerSec+metric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please take a look and provide your feedback. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > >
