Sorry,
so used to the users mailing list...
Thanks for the remarks. hope I didn't miss any.
Not even sure if it makes sense to introduce A and B or just stick with
"this ktable", "other ktable"
Thank you
Jan
On 27.10.2017 06:58, Ted Yu wrote:
Do you mind addressing my previous comments ?
http://search-hadoop.com/m/Kafka/uyzND1hzF8SRzUqb?subj=Re+DISCUSS+KIP+213+Support+non+key+joining+in+KTable
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Jan Filipiak <jan.filip...@trivago.com>
wrote:
Hello everyone,
this is the new discussion thread after the ID-clash.
Best
Jan
______
Hello Kafka-users,
I want to continue with the development of KAFKA-3705, which allows the
Streams DSL to perform KTableKTable-Joins when the KTables have a
one-to-many relationship.
To make sure we cover the requirements of as many users as possible and
have a good solution afterwards I invite everyone to read through the KIP I
put together and discuss it here in this Thread.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-213+
Support+non-key+joining+in+KTable
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3705
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3720
I think a public discussion and vote on a solution is exactly what is
needed to bring this feauture into kafka-streams. I am looking forward to
everyones opinion!
Please keep the discussion on the mailing list rather than commenting on
the wiki (wiki discussions get unwieldy fast).
Best
Jan
