Thanks for the info. There is no hurry. Was just curious :) -Matthias
On 12/5/17 7:34 PM, vito jeng wrote: > Matthias, > > Still in progress. I've been busy in recent weeks with my job. > > But I believe I will update this KIP within few days. > > > > > --- > Vito > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> > wrote: > >> Vito, >> >> is there any update with regard to this KIP? >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> On 11/5/17 6:11 PM, vito jeng wrote: >>> Thanks, Guozhang and Matthias. Your comments very useful for me. >>> >>> I'll update KIP and keep going on. >>> >>> >>> >>> --- >>> Vito >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the KIP Vito! >>>> >>>> I agree with what Guozhang said. The original idea of the Jira was, to >>>> give different exceptions for different "recovery" strategies to the >> user. >>>> >>>> For example, if a store is currently recreated, a user just need to wait >>>> and can query the store later. On the other hand, if a store go migrated >>>> to another instance, a user needs to rediscover the store instead of a >>>> "plain retry". >>>> >>>> Fatal errors might be a third category. >>>> >>>> Not sure if there is something else? >>>> >>>> Anyway, the KIP should contain a section that talks about this ideas and >>>> reasoning. >>>> >>>> >>>> -Matthias >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/3/17 11:26 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote: >>>>> Thanks for writing up the KIP. >>>>> >>>>> Vito, Matthias: one thing that I wanted to figure out first is what >>>>> categories of errors we want to notify the users, if we only wants to >>>>> distinguish fatal v.s. retriable then probably we should rename the >>>>> proposed StateStoreMigratedException / StateStoreClosedException >> classes. >>>>> And then from there we should list what are the possible internal >>>>> exceptions ever thrown in those APIs in the call trace, and which >>>>> exceptions should be wrapped to what others, and which ones should be >>>>> handled without re-throwing, and which ones should not be wrapped at >> all >>>>> but directly thrown to user's face. >>>>> >>>>> Guozhang >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:09 PM, vito jeng <v...@is-land.com.tw> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to start discuss KIP-216: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >>>>>> 216%3A+IQ+should+throw+different+exceptions+for+different+errors >>>>>> >>>>>> Please have a look. >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Vito >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
