+1 On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > Thanks, Ismael! > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 at 15:47 Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > The Apache Infra team has started a new project earlier this year > called > > > GitBox that supports two-way synchronization between GitHub and > > > git-wip-us.apache.org and, most importantly, provides GitHub write > > access > > > to committers. GitBox is not generally available yet, but individual > > > projects can ask to be migrated. > > > > > > I would like to start a vote on migrating kafka and kafka-site to > GitBox > > > and: > > > > > > 1. Providing GitHub write access to committers (this requires dual > factor > > > authentication) > > > 2. Allowing merges via the GitHub UI as well as the existing merge > script > > > 3. Enabling protected branches for trunk and release branches so that > > > merges via the GitHub UI can only be done if the tests pass and the PR > > has > > > been approved by a committer > > > 4. Only allowing the "squash and merge" strategy for GitHub UI merges > > > 5. Updating the merge script so that the GitHub git repo is the target > of > > > the merge > > > 6. Disallowing force pushes to trunk and release branches > > > > > > The discussion thread talks about some of the pros and cons (mostly > pros) > > > of this change: > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7031168e7026222169c66fed29f520 > > 0fc4b561df28c242ccf706f326@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > > > > > > The vote will run for 72 hours. > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > >
