Thank you, Gwen! =) I think that puts us over the finish line. Unless I hear any objections in the next 12(ish) hours I’ll move the KIP to accepted on the wiki.
On December 12, 2017 at 7:50:23 PM, Gwen Shapira (g...@confluent.io) wrote: +1 (binding) - looks awesome. On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:42 AM Matt Farmer <m...@frmr.me> wrote: > Current tally here is 2 binding +1s, 4 non-binding +1s. > > The remaining remarks on the PR seem to mostly be nits, so I feel like > we’ve converged a bit. If a committer could take a look and either leave me > some feedback on the discussion thread or give me a +1, I’d really > appreciate it. :) > > Thanks! > > > On December 6, 2017 at 2:07:08 PM, Matthias J. Sax (matth...@confluent.io) > wrote: > > +1 > > > > On 12/6/17 7:54 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Matt Farmer <m...@frmr.me> wrote: > > > >> Bumping this thread so it’s visible given that the conversation on > KIP-210 > >> has converged again. > >> > >> Current tally is 2 binding +1s, and 2 non-binding +1s. > >> > >> On November 8, 2017 at 12:26:32 PM, Damian Guy (damian....@gmail.com) > >> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 at 16:50 Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> > wrote: > >> > >>> Yes. A KIP needs 3 binding "+1" to be accepted. > >>> > >>> You can still work on the PR and get it ready to get merged -- I am > >>> quite confident that this KIP will be accepted :) > >>> > >>> > >>> -Matthias > >>> > >>> On 11/4/17 3:56 PM, Matt Farmer wrote: > >>>> Bump! I believe I need two more binding +1's to proceed? > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:49 AM Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 (binding) from me. Thanks! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> The vote should stay open for at least 72 hours. The bylaws can be > >>>>> found > >>>>>>> here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Bylaws > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Matt Farmer <m...@frmr.me> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hello all, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It seems like discussion around KIP-210 has gone to a lull. I've > >> got > >>>>>> some > >>>>>>>> candidate work underway for it already, so I'd like to go ahead > and > >>>>> call > >>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>> to a vote. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> For reference, the KIP can be found here: > >>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-210+-+ > >>>>>>>> > >>> Provide+for+custom+error+handling++when+Kafka+Streams+fails+to+produce > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Also, how long to vote threads stay open generally before changing > >>> the > >>>>>>>> status of the KIP? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>> Matt > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> -- Guozhang > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> -- Guozhang > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > >
