Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the KIP!
Could we consider taking an approach similar to what was done in KIP-182
with regards to overloading?
Meaning we could add a "Forwarded" object (horrible name I know) with
methods withTimestamp, withChildName, and withChildIndex. To handle the
case when both a child-name and child-index is provided we could throw an
exception.
Then we could reduce the overloaded {{forward}} methods from 6 to 2.
Thanks,
Bill
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Paolo Patierno <ppatie...@live.com> wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> just a question : what will be the timestamp "type" in the new message on
> the wire ?
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo.
> ________________________________
> From: Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 2:06 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in Processor API
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to propose a new KIP for Kafka Streams that allows timestamp
> manipulation at Processor API level.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 251%3A+Allow+timestamp+manipulation+in+Processor+API
>
> Looking forward to your feedback.
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
