Hi all, I'm closing this discussion and marking KIP-288 as discarded. Please pick up the discussion on the KIP-266 thread.
Thanks, -John On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:07 PM, John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > Ah, I see that this KIP is a sub-kip of KIP-266. Sorry about that; I've > sent a message to the discussion thread of KIP-266 to work this out. > > Thanks, > -John > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:29 PM, John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > >> Thanks, Richard, I'll check it out. >> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Richard Yu <yohan.richard...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi John, >>> >>> bq. #1 (wait for metadata) is infinite. >>> >>> Some of what you stated in this KIP has already been previously discussed >>> in a older KIP. (KIP-266) >>> Just for your reference. >>> >>> Thanks, Richard >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:08 AM, John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hello all, >>> > >>> > I am proposing KIP-288 to improve the semantics of Consumer.poll() >>> w.r.t. >>> > the timeout parameter and to add a new method for blocking for >>> assignment >>> > only. >>> > >>> > Please find the details here: >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >>> > 288%3A+Consumer.poll%28%29+timeout+semantic+change+and+ >>> > new+waitForAssignment+method >>> > >>> > Please let me know what you think! >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > -John >>> > >>> >> >> >
