Thank you, everyone. I have updated the KIP to address Jason's comment. I am also closing this vote with 4 binding and 3 non-binding votes, and no objections.
Thanks, Dhruvil On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:55 AM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dhruvil, Thanks for the KIP! > > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > > Rajini > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > +1. Just one nit: could we use an INT type for the config? I can't > imagine > > that not being enough. > > > > -Jason > > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 7:52 AM Dhruvil Shah <dhru...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-306 which proposes to add a > > > > configuration to delay responses to failed authentication. > > > > > > > > Link to the KIP: > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > 306%3A+Configuration+for+Delaying+Response+to+Failed+ > > Client+Authentication > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dhruvil > > > > > > > > > >
