Good job Ray for the wiki, it's clear enough.

Le 23 juil. 2018 10:17 PM, "Ray Chiang" <rchi...@apache.org> a écrit :

Okay, I've created a wiki page Reporting Issues in Apache Kafka
<
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Reporting+Issues+in+Apache+Kafka>.

I'd appreciate any feedback.  If this is good enough, I can file a JIRA
to change the link under "Bugs" in the "Project information" page.


-Ray


On 7/23/18 11:28 AM, Ray Chiang wrote:
> Good point.  I'll look into adding some JIRA guidelines to the
> documentation/wiki.
>
> -Ray
>
> On 7/22/18 10:23 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>> Hello Ray,
>>
>> Thanks for brining this up. I'm generally +1 on the first two, while for
>> the last category, personally I felt leaving them as part of `tools` is
>> fine, but I'm also open for other opinions.
>>
>> A more general question though, is that today we do not have any
>> guidelines
>> to ask JIRA reporters to set the right component, i.e. it is purely
>> best-effort, and we cannot disallow reporters to add any new component
>> names. And so far the project does not really have a tradition to manage
>> JIRA reports per-component, as the goal is to not "separate" the project
>> into silos but recommending everyone to get hands on every aspect of the
>> project.
>>
>>
>> Guozhang
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Ray Chiang <rchi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I've been doing a little bit of component cleanup in JIRA.  What do
>>> people
>>> think of adding
>>> one or more of the following components?
>>>
>>> - logging: For any consumer/producer/broker logging (i.e. log4j). This
>>> should help disambiguate from the "log" component (i.e. Kafka
>>> messages).
>>>
>>> - mirrormaker: There are enough requests specific to MirrorMaker
>>> that it
>>> could be put into its own component.
>>>
>>> - scripts: I'm a little more ambivalent about this one, but any of the
>>> bin/*.sh script fixes could belong in their own category.  I'm not
>>> sure if
>>> other people feel strongly for how the "tools" component should be used
>>> w.r.t. the run scripts.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> -Ray
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to