+1 (non-binding)
Den ons 10 apr. 2019 kl 02:38 skrev Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>: > +1 (binding). Thanks for the written KIP! The approach lgtm. > > One minor thing: the name of "last epoch" maybe a bit misleading (although > it is for internal usage only and will not be exposed to users) for future > developers, how about rename it to "required_epoch" and if it is set to > "-1" it means "not required, hence not checks"? > > Guozhang > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:02 PM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Bump (for Guozhang) > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:55 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-360: > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-360%3A+Improve+handling+of+unknown+producer > >> . > >> > >> +1 from me (duh) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Jason > >> > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
