On Mon, May 13, 2019, at 11:49, Aishwarya Gune wrote: > Thank you everyone for the discussion and voting for KIP-461 > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-461+-+Improve+Replica+Fetcher+behavior+at+handling+partition+failure>. > Closing the vote on this KIP which passes with -
I'm assuming that you meant to close this last week before the KIP freeze on Saturday. Since all the votes were made before the KIP freeze, I'm going to allow this into 2.3 :) > - 5 binding (Jason, Colin, Gwen, Jun, Harsha) > - 1 non-binding (Dhruvil) In the future you might want to write this as +5 binding. When I first glanced at this I saw -5 binding, which made me think of 5 -1 votes. Thanks again for the KIP. best, Colin > > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:53 AM Harsha Chintalapani <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1(binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Harsha > > On May 9, 2019, 9:58 AM -0700, Jun Rao <[email protected]>, wrote: > > > Hi, Aishwarya, > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1 > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:30 PM Aishwarya Gune <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi All! > > > > > > > > I would like to call for a vote on KIP-461 that would improve the > > behavior > > > > of replica fetcher in case of partition failure. The fetcher thread > > would > > > > just stop monitoring the crashed partition instead of terminating. > > > > > > > > Here's a link to the KIP - > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-461+-+Improve+Replica+Fetcher+behavior+at+handling+partition+failure > > > > > > > > Discussion thread - > > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg97559.html > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thank you, > > > > Aishwarya > > > > > > > > > -- > Thank you, > Aishwarya >
