I have no objections to changing things to version 2.1.0 either, as long as it doesn't cause any technical issues as we were trying to avoid beforehand at Felix.
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > We used to do that inside the Felix TLP, mostly because of the OSGi > versioning. > In OSGi, > 2.0.0 < 2.1.0 < 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT > This was a rule in Felix, but I agree we could come back to a more > natural versioning and go for 2.1.0 > I have never really seen a case where this was actually a problem, > especially if the snapshots are called 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT for example. > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 02:00, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >> Mhm, just curious but y do you jump from 2.0.0 to 2.2.0? >> >> Kind regards, >> Andreas >> >> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:24:22AM -0230, Jamie G. wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Development since our last release has been proceeding at a brisk >>> pace. Karaf 2.2.0 is on track to contain 11 bug fixes, 28 >>> improvements, and 7 new features! As such, I believe that we should >>> begin the discussion of when we would like to cut our next release. >>> When we've determined what we'd like to include, and have a release >>> week chosen, I'd be happy to volunteer for the release management >>> process again. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jamie >>> >>> http://icodebythesea.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
