Good, this means according to [1] that some PMC has to setup the hudson build (or give me the required permissions to do it myself :)).
kind regards, andreas [1] http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote: > That sounds like a good idea for the snapshot builds :) > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >> Basically I've no problems with that; but I think we really should >> provide hudson builds (and automate deploys to apache-snapshot repos) >> for all supported branches, don't you think? >> >> kind regards, >> andreas >> >> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Andreas, >>> >>> It doesn't appear that we have a written policy for Karaf maintenance. >>> In general we reserve trunk for new development, and the patch >>> branches for bug fixes (and the rare improvement that does not break >>> backwards compatibility). >>> >>> Right now the current active support is on the 2.1.x branch and main >>> trunk. After the 2.2.0 release occurs then we will have the 2.1.x, >>> 2.2.x, and the new trunk as active lines. I do not believe we have a >>> planned discontinue of support for the earlier releases, if such was >>> to be considered I'm sure that we would have an open discussion and >>> vote on the matter. Personally, as long as bug fixes are being >>> submitted to past branches I'm more than happy to spin up a release >>> candidate for consideration & vote. >>> >>> If anyone else knows better on the subject please help clarify the matter :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jamie >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> I've seen that there had been a commit to karaf-2.0.x branch; do we still >>>> support it? What is the maintenance "policy" for karaf? Which versions do >>>> we >>>> officially support? Only the latest stable release (e.g. 2.1.x for now)? >>>> Where do we "have" to back-port bug-fixes... E.g. if I find a problem in >>>> 2.1.2; >>>> do I have to also fix it in 2.0.x (if it exists there)? >>>> >>>> In addition to this question: IMHO we should also setup Hudson build >>>> targets for >>>> all "officially" supported versions to make bug-fixes easier and faster >>>> available via snapshots in the apache snapshot repository. >>>> >>>> Any ideas? Are there already guidelines documented anywhere? >>>> >>>> kind regards, >>>> andreas >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
