It's fine for me. The main idea of this rule is to avoid regressions, so if anything bad happen, you'll be responsible for it ;-) Seriously, I think this improvement is small enough to get through as the risks of side effects / regressions are quite low i think.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > For the need of KARAF-403, I've created osgi:info command which read the > OSGi-INF/bundle.info bundle entry and display it. > > I'm working on Apache ServiceMix bundles to add this OSGi-INF/bundle.info. > > The target is to use it in ServiceMix 4.3.0. > > As ServiceMix 4.3.0-SNAPSHOT is based on Karaf 2.1.3, the question is: what > do you think if I merge the osgi:info command on Karaf 2.1.x branch ? > > I know that we defined that the Karaf 2.1.x branch should only contain bug > fixes, but it could be interesting to get this new feature for ServiceMix > 4.3.0. > > WDYT ? > > Thanks > Regards > JB > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
