So where are we at with the assemblies ? We currently have: trunk/assembly (the still in use assemblies) trunk/features/assembly/enteprise (contains a feature descriptor) trunk/features/assembly/standard (contains a feature descriptor) trunk/features/assembly/framework (supposed to be the minimal assembly?) trunk/assemblies/apache-karaf (supposed to be the main distribution?)
In all cases, I'm not really happy about having assemblies in trunk/features and I'd like them moved to trunk/assemblies if possible. Second, this is not really usable yet, so do we plan to finish that for 2.2 or postpone for 3.0 ? Last, I'm still worried of having to split our release cycle in two because of the maven plugin, so I'm not sure how we should deal with that. THoughts? On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:23, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, from my point of view we can move everything but the following issues > > 254, 338, 334 (optionally), 424 (including 401). > > kind regards, > andreas > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:47:33AM -0330, Jamie G. wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> We're rapidly approaching being able to cut a release candidate for >> Apache Karaf 2.2.0. At this time I'd like to encourage everyone to >> quickly review open issues in Jira for the 2.2.0 branch, and to test >> their local snapshot builds and report any issues you encounter >> (especially platform specific issues - i.e. IBM Java or WIndows). >> >> Apache Karaf 2.2.0 issue tracker (see issues tab for complete list of >> open 2.2.0 issues): >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF/fixforversion/12315328 >> >> Cheers, >> Jamie > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
