Hey christian, I'm also not sure for 100% but I think it has something to do with osgi versioning (that's also the reason y felix always jumps one version); but Guillaume can explain in detail :)
kind regards, andreas On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:30:43AM +0100, Christian Schneider wrote: > Why not simply use : > > For a stable branch: > 2.1.4-SNAPSHOT -> 2.1.4 -> 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT -> 2.1.5 > > For the develop branch: > 2.2-SNAPSHOT -> 2.2.0 -> 2.3-SNAPSHOT -> 2.3.0 > > I think most projects use this scheme. > > Christian > > > Am 07.02.2011 08:09, schrieb Andreas Pieber: > >Hey, > > > >We've decided some time ago now to step from one version to the other and not > >jumping releases in between like felix does. Therefore we use quite "strange" > >snapshot versions (e.g. 2.99.99-SNAPSHOT for 3.0.0 or 2.1.99-SNAPSHOT for > >2.2.0). But on the 2.1.x branch we use 2.1.4-SNPASHOT for 2.1.4. Well, I > >think > >something is wrong here :) > > > >IMHO we can either use 2.1.3.99-SNAPSHOT for 2.1.4 or simply switch back at > >2.0.99-SNAPSHOT after releasing; in other words we have two options: > > > >2.1.3.99-SNAP -> 2.1.4 -> 2.1.4.99-SNAP -> 2.1.5 > >2.0.99-SNAP -> 2.1.4 -> 2.0.99-SNAP -> 2.1.5 > > > >I slightly prefer the first method since it maps the versions we choose for > >all > >other snapshots but basically I'm indifferent :) > > > >WDYT? > > > >kind regards, > >andreas > > > > -- > ---- > http://www.liquid-reality.de >
pgpLTbb11tQU5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
