ok, what's the result? :) Go back to the more natural style: 1.0-SNAPSHOT -> 1.0 -> 1.1-SNAPSHOT -> 1.1 ...?
kind regards, andreas On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:09:36AM +0100, Andreas Pieber wrote: > Hey, > > We've decided some time ago now to step from one version to the other and not > jumping releases in between like felix does. Therefore we use quite "strange" > snapshot versions (e.g. 2.99.99-SNAPSHOT for 3.0.0 or 2.1.99-SNAPSHOT for > 2.2.0). But on the 2.1.x branch we use 2.1.4-SNPASHOT for 2.1.4. Well, I think > something is wrong here :) > > IMHO we can either use 2.1.3.99-SNAPSHOT for 2.1.4 or simply switch back at > 2.0.99-SNAPSHOT after releasing; in other words we have two options: > > 2.1.3.99-SNAP -> 2.1.4 -> 2.1.4.99-SNAP -> 2.1.5 > 2.0.99-SNAP -> 2.1.4 -> 2.0.99-SNAP -> 2.1.5 > > I slightly prefer the first method since it maps the versions we choose for > all > other snapshots but basically I'm indifferent :) > > WDYT? > > kind regards, > andreas >
pgpj4WGNGzwLo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
