Agree Guillaume,
that's why I splitted in three points. The two first points are really
Karaf related.
The third one is more "general" and it could be work together with
others projects (such as Felix, Geronimo, ServiceMix, etc).
Regards
JB
On 02/28/2011 10:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The web console has been designed to be very lightweight, and the
first consequence is of course the fact that by not using a big
framework, the code is a bit more complicated as you have seen.
If we plan to rewrite one, we need to make sure the benefits outweight
the drawbacks of rewriting for the sake of it, as if we are to
rewrite, we will have to actually maintain it, whereas, now, the felix
community does the maintenance. Also, i don't think such a console
is specific to Karaf, so it might very well make sense to look for
other communities to work together (such as felix, sling, geronimo)
...
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 21:06, Charles Moulliard<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
This week-end, I have spend some time on Apache Felix& Karaf
WebConsole code. What I have discovered make me very unhappy and
frustrated because the project(s) lack of structure, complicate the
development of screens and decrease development productivity (html
code is mixed in javascript, json variables are set everywhere in the
code and use in several of javascript functions, no template is used
to render html pages, locale is not used to translate text, ....).
I have no idea about what is planned to do for the future (Karaf 3.0),
if we will continue to use Apache Felix WebConsole or create our own
web console, but a reflexion about which Web frameworks, Ajax
Javascript should take place to simplify development lifecycle.
Regards,
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer
Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
Skype: cmoulliard
