Absolutely! One thing just popped into my head: wouldn't it make sense to use a classifier: distribution for the karaf distributions? I think we should keep all projects directly linked to assembling (features, distribution, ...) in karaf/assemblies but use m2 descriptors like:
> org.apache.karaf/standard/xml/features > org.apache.karaf/enterprise/xml/features org.apache.karaf/apache-karaf/zip/distribution org.apache.karaf/apache-karaf-minimal/zip/distribution .... WDYT? Kind regards, Andreas 2011/3/25 Jean-Baptiste Onofré (JIRA) <[email protected]>: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011073#comment-13011073 > ] > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on KARAF-530: > -------------------------------------------- > > As the classifier is already features, it's more logic to use: > > org.apache.karaf/standard/xml/features > org.apache.karaf/enterprise/xml/features > >> Rename org.apache.karaf.assemblies/apache-karaf to >> org.apache.karaf/apache-karaf >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: KARAF-530 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-530 >> Project: Karaf >> Issue Type: Improvement >> Affects Versions: 3.0.0 >> Reporter: Andreas Pieber >> Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> Fix For: 3.0.0 >> >> >> As discussed with gnodet the apache-karaf distribution should stay in the >> root namespace > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >
