Andreas, I think we are saying the almost the same thing :-) Indeed if we use something like "optional" features it would be more easy. So its a +1 from me.
How do you think it should work in cases that optional features is not installed (dependencies are not meet) but are fulfilled later? On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > mhm wouldn't it be easier to allow optional feature reverences? something > like > > featue name=x > feature version=1 optional=true featue-management > > this would require much less src modifications, no new commands. if > requirements of the optional subfeatueres are not met we ignore it, if you > install it directly, the old behaviour jumps in... WDYT? > > kind regards Andreas > On Apr 5, 2011 7:11 PM, "Ioannis Canellos" <[email protected]> wrote: > -- *Ioannis Canellos* * http://iocanel.blogspot.com Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer *
