I'm unsure about the 3.0 version also. There are certain things on the road-map which are still not fully discussed for example the clustering thing. At least I didn't see anything on the mailing-list for this :) >From my feeling we are not at close to a 3.0 version yet. Probably need a 2.3 then I guess, on the other hand we stated that we do switch to Java 6 and since Java 7 is on the road we really should get some momentum on this :)
Regards, Achim Am 09.04.2011 15:05, schrieb Andreas Pieber: > Mhm... I've no problems by delaying 3.x longer, but in this case I > think we may should also develop on a 2.3.x release? There are already > (and there will be more over the next weeks) features on 3.x branch > (which could be backported easily) which are very valuable and which > we could/should make available faster. > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm partial to the mantra of "release early, release often", but I'd >> say we should at least be talking 2 months out for Karaf 3.0.0. >> >> I've been holding off starting up the user survey just to give the >> development direction of the 3.x branch some time to come into focus. >> If it is felt that we should accelerate however then perhaps this >> survey project can be bumped up the priority list. >> >> I'm also keeping in mind that we have a 2.2.1 and 2.1.5 release >> already on the work queue, so some community dev cycles are going to >> be allocated to those over the next few weeks, instead of focussing on >> trunk. >> >> As to the Karaf 3.x for m3 and Karaf 2.x for m2 compatibility, I'm >> liking the idea. Karaf 2.x is already the JDK 1.5 compatible line, >> we'd just redefine it as the JDK 1.5 / m2 line. Karaf 3.x being JDK >> 1.6+, m3. >> >> Cheers, >> Jamie >> >> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> We're having some open issues belonging to mvn3 (KARAF-504, >>> KARAF-482). IMHO we should rather make karaf-3 available quite soon >>> (1-2 month), fix all m3 issues there and define karaf-2.x officially >>> compatible to m2? WDYT? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Andreas >>>
