Well, I can live with this proposal too, BUT then we should really
limit the number of features planned for 3.0, move them to 3.1 and try
to set a "date-limit" for 3.0. As discussed on other branches already
there is a number of features which are not as "groundbraking" as
davids kar changes, planed clustering and so on and for which I do not
want to wait another 3-4 months...

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> I second David around.
>
> We decides to prepare Karaf 3.0.0 for focus on JDK 1.6 support, maven 3
> support, etc.
>
> I propose:
> 1/ now, to all focus on the 2.2.1 release (we are not so far)
> 2/ move all 2.1.x and 2.2.x issues on 3.0.0 and focus on 3.0.0 to be able to
> release a 3.0.0 version soon
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 04/16/2011 12:11 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>> I think an alternative would be to release 3.0.0 soon and put the new
>> features on trunk.   I've found that its much easier to create new branches
>> than to maintain them.  Could someone explain why a new branch is better
>> than a soon 3.0.0 release?
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>
>> On Apr 15, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jamie G. wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> There has been a number of discussions regarding trying out new
>>> features on the 2.x branch while we are continuing to work towards a
>>> 3.0.x release, as such I think it may be worth discussing if we'd like
>>> to create a Karaf 2.3 branch?
>>>
>>> This branch would contain new features to the 2.x branch, and back
>>> ported features from the 3.0 line. As this is a 2.x branch it would
>>> continue to be JDK 1.5&  m2 compatible - we move to JKD 1.6&  m3 on
>>> the Karaf 3.0 line.
>>>
>>> At this point I would presume the logical branch cut line would be
>>> starting from the 2.2.1 tag once available? The 2.2.x line would
>>> continue on in support mode, with 2.3.x collecting new features.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jamie
>>
>

Reply via email to