Absolutely.
Karaf and ServiceMix is not exactly the same purpose.
It makes sense to have:
- ServiceMix group more ESB oriented, especially interesting to get
discussion around SMX5
- Karaf group more OSGi container oriented
Regards
JB
On 04/21/2011 07:32 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
We all know that a lot of ServiceMix users are interested in Karaf,
but that does not mean that there's no room for two separate groups
there. Wouldn't it make more sense to rename one of those to Apache
ServiceMix and keep the other one for Apache Karaf ?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 16:48, Charles Moulliard<[email protected]> wrote:
Jamie,
I name the group as Apache Karaf - Servicemix because ServiceMix name
is much more established then Karaf and karaf less but plan to rename
it later on into Apache Karaf no matter if it is related to
ServiceMix, Geronimo, Talend, ...
Regards,
Charles
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Jamie G.<[email protected]> wrote:
The Apache Karaf - Servicemix Integration platforms group is perfectly
fine as is, I just wanted to create a more expanded group for projects
which are not necessarily Servicemix related. So instead of creating
Karaf-Geronimo, Karaf-OpenTSB, Karaf-Camel, etc I decided to create a
more generic Karaf group to cover all the different and future users
and uses of the project.
Cheers,
Jamie
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Charles Moulliard
<[email protected]> wrote:
Why do you create a new group : there is already a Apache Karaf -
ServiceMix group ?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jamie G.<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All,
I've created an open join group for Apache Karaf on LinkedIn.
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Apache-Karaf-3881000
It's for all users& uses of Karaf, so please join the discussions,
network, and have fun :)
Cheers,
Jamie
