To feel more unixy, why not just use the name of the shell as the command? karaf@root> camel karaf@root> #camel> route:list karaf@root> #camel> route:stop karaf@root> exit karaf@root> ace karaf@root> #ace> distribution:list karaf@root> exit
Or failing that "shell" would seem a good choice karaf@root> shell camel karaf@root> #camel> route:list karaf@root> #camel> route:stop karaf@root> exit karaf@root> shell ace karaf@root> #ace> distribution:list karaf@root> exit On 17 May 2011 09:22, Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for the idea. > > I would like to propose however to context switch using an other command > instead of "cd" because "cd" will cause confusion. I would propose ctx > instead. > > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > http://iocanel.blogspot.com > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer > * > -- James ------- FuseSource Email: [email protected] Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Connect at CamelOne May 24-26 The Open Source Integration Conference http://camelone.com/
