I am glad that I see so much interest in it. It would make sense to use quartz instead of Java Timer mostly due to the fact that quartz supports thread pooling while timers don't. So, I think that it would be a good idea to replace Timers with Quartz.
@Glenn: No problem with peeping. We actually love feedback! What I have in mind is providing a simple / simplistic feature that will hide the details from the user (quartz api etc). I didn't intend to build a scheduler myself, I just intended to integrate a the service registry with a scheduling mechanism. @Mark: It would make sense to have a common mechanism. I will have a look at what sling provides. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * http://iocanel.blogspot.com Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer *
