Since you write more or less... Do we also want to include this into the Karaf documentation and "officially" use this convention? In addition does smx also provide a checkstyle configuration which we can/want use?
Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 20:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Scotte, > > you can use the ServiceMix convention: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**servicemix/smx3/branches/** > servicemix-3.2/build/src/main/**resources/smx-eclipse-code-** > conventions.xml?view=markup<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/branches/servicemix-3.2/build/src/main/resources/smx-eclipse-code-conventions.xml?view=markup> > > We use more or less the same convention. > > Regards > JB > > > On 08/10/2011 06:18 PM, sully6768 wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Are there established coding standards for the Karaf project? I have >> found >> them for ServiceMix and Felix, both of which are different but not Karaf. >> >> I have some bug fixes, enhancements and examples that I would like to >> start >> submitting but before I do I wanted to see what is considered the >> standard. >> >> I use Eclipse so if there is a formatter template that can be selected, it >> would be helpful. >> >> Thanks, >> scotte >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.** >> com/Karaf-Coding-Standards-**tp3243084p3243084.html<http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-Coding-Standards-tp3243084p3243084.html> >> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
