Can you explain why you want this? I think serializable objects usually lead to nothing but trouble.
thanks david jencks On Aug 24, 2011, at 9:00 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote: > While it is not required for the karaf-webconsole it would still help if > various "simple java bean objects" in Karaf would be serializable. This is > not required, but on the other hand I don't consider it bad practice to make > objects which should only contain plain values serializable. In specific I > propose (for now at least :-)) to make the following interfaces > serializable: > > # modified: > features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/BundleInfo.java > # modified: > features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/ConfigFileInfo.java > # modified: > features/core/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/features/Feature.java > > > WDYT? > > Kind regards, > Andreas
