On Thursday, September 08, 2011 1:50:53 PM Achim Nierbeck wrote: > Hi, > > I'd rather stay with 3.0.6 since it's a patch release. > Didn't Camel and CXF plan on supporting version ranges for this ? > Right now I'm quite astonished that both are bound to the patch level. > Or is this just me?
Going FORWARD, CXF and Camel will be using version ranges to isolate themselves a bit from this. The problem is the previous releases that were not using the ranges properly. Dan > > just my 2 cents here. > > Regards, Achim > > 2011/9/8 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: > > True, I think it's the easiest way, but we really have to document/warn > > about CXF 2.4.2 and Camel 2.8.x will not work on Karaf 2.2.3 out of the > > box. > > > > My question is: > > - do we rollback Spring version ? > > - do we stay with Spring 3.0.6, I'm fine with that, but we have to > > really > > document/warn the users about the impact of this update > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 09/08/2011 12:31 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote: > >> I've though we've settled with staying with Spring 3.0.6.RELEASE and > >> cxf/camel upgrade? > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:07, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> following our previous discussion around Camel and CXF, I would > >>> like: > >>> > >>> - to rollback to Spring 3.0.5.RELEASE on karaf-2.2.x branch > >>> - release Karaf 2.2.4 or maybe override the Karaf 2.2.3 with Spring > >>> 3.0.5.RELEASE > >>> - let the Spring 3.0.6.RELEASE upgrade to Karaf 3.0.x > >>> > >>> WDYT ? > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> -- > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > [email protected] > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com
