Makes sense, let's drop jdk 5 then.

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 15:26, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote:

> It occurs more often that our desired dependencies require JDK 6.
> We've taken great care on the 2.1.x and 2.2.x lines to ensure JDK 5
> compatibility, if we drop this requirement on 2.3.x branch then it
> opens more opportunities to make things easier in transition to the
> Karaf 3.0 (JDK 6 minimum) code base.
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Not sure if forcing 1.6 is really required.  Does that bring any value ?
> > Another way is does that even change anything for us ?
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 15:16, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The concept of a 2.3.x branch to bridge the differences between 2.2.x
> >> and the to be 3.0.0 makes sense  from the point of view of providing
> >> our user base an easier transition. I would like to know if we intend
> >> to keep JDK 1.5 compatibility on 2.3.x or if we'll have to enforce an
> >> update to JDK 1.6?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jamie
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > we started to perform a bunch of changes on the Karaf trunk (future
> Karaf
> >> > 3.0 branch): refactoring on the commands to introduce the sub-shell,
> >> update
> >> > to Pax Web 2.0 and Jetty 8, renaming on the commands, new OSGi
> release,
> >> new
> >> > Aries version, etc.
> >> >
> >> > It means a huge change for the users.
> >> >
> >> > As our Karaf 2.2.x branch is our current stable branch, Guillaume and
> I
> >> > discussed the creation of a Karaf 2.3.x branch (waiting the 3.0
> release).
> >> >
> >> > This branch will include "minor" new features and dependencies
> upgrade.
> >> >
> >> > Especially, I think it could be interesting to do on this branch:
> >> > - new OSGi release and framework update
> >> > - Aries update
> >> > - scp support and others minor new features
> >> >
> >> > WDYT ?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Regards
> >> > JB
> >> > --
> >> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > ------------------------
> > Open Source SOA
> > http://fusesource.com
> >
>



-- 
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to