I always find demos and samples a confusing area. On the one hand its really good to supply examples of what you can do, on the other hand it is not fun to get a server bogged down with a lot of stuff you don't want or need.
If we can decide that our message is "all non-trivial uses of karaf should have their own custom assembly" then it would be reasonable to have the full server include lots of demos. I'm not familiar with how the demos have been set up in the past or what you have in mind here. I'm not really in favor of shipping source code with the server assembly, which suggests to me that having each demo as a kar or feature would be appropriate. thanks david jencks On Nov 25, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Jamie G. wrote: > Apologies for confusion; under assemblies we have apache-karaf and > apache-karaf-minimal, with an empty directory for apache-karaf-full. > > So two distributions that we actually build kits for. So restating my > question, will kits under assemblies/apache-karaf contain demos? > > Cheers, > Jamie > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote: >> Something we need to nail down for Karaf 3.0.0 is just which >> distributions we'll be publishing. >> >> In assemblies we have references to standard, full, enterprise, and minimal. >> >> As the standard (apache-karaf) does not build with demos included I'll >> assume that we'll have those in full/enterprise edition? >> >> Cheers, >> Jamie >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Thanks Guillaume ;) >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 11/25/2011 04:54 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>>> >>>> Just fixed it. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 16:41, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Lukasz, >>>>> >>>>> what do you mean list ? >>>>> >>>>> It's certainly due to the renaming of the commands on trunk. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 11/25/2011 03:26 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Btw. currently list command on trunk displays list of services, >>>>>> shouldn't >>>>>> we list bundles, as it is done currently? Will subshells improve this >>>>>> area? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Lukasz >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, November 25, 2011 2:42:05 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For sure. We depend on a snapshot for now, but I think aries trunk >>>>>>>> is in a usable state for us, so we just need a release of that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's getting much closer, yes. There is a little more work for >>>>>>> ARIES-626 and >>>>>>> we have to figure out the fragment bundle thing for the compatibility, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> it's definitely better than 0.4. :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dan >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 14:36, Daniel Kulp<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, we definitely need to get a usable blueprint. 0.4 is not >>>>>>>>> (IMO). >>>>>>>>> Thus, we'd either need to back down to 0.3 or work hard to get an >>>>>>>>> updated >>>>>>>>> 0.4.1 out first. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, November 24, 2011 11:31:24 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think we should start planning a 3.0 release as soon as possible. >>>>>>>>>> I have the following big new features in mind: >>>>>>>>>> * regions (KARAF-1009) >>>>>>>>>> * subshells (KARAF-647) >>>>>>>>>> * profiles >>>>>>>>>> * test framework (KARAF-1004) >>>>>>>>>> Do you guys have anything more in mind or should we start thinking >>>>>>>>>> about releasing once those 3 big new features are included ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The JIRA contains more than 90 opened issues for 3.0 and I think we >>>>>>>>>> should trim that to whatever we can do in the coming weeks. >>>>>>>>>> Having 3.0 released in a few weeks, maybe aim for mid-december would >>>>>>>>>> be good imho. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp >>>>>>>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog >>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Daniel Kulp >>>>>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog >>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>
