OK, so you're just creating an enhanced version of the disappeared ls
command, and wish to name it services:list instead of services:ls, for
greater naming consistency (silly to have bundles:list but services:ls,
unless you're interesting in having both available for the user without
need to type in the scope.) Sounds good.
I haven't checked, but it seems hard to believe the "ls" command (or a
similar equivalent) is no longer present in 3.0 -- I would think it's a
useful command that should be retained, unless it's already been
replaced by something better in 3.0. So I guess my only remaining
suggestion would be to make sure yours is the only services:list-type
command we have in 3.0; otherwise to rename and enhance whatever already
existing command there is in 3.0 with the new functionality.
Regards,
Glen
On 12/02/2011 08:40 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Good questions.
The bundle:list and list should definately still show bundles.
From what I see in trunk the ls and osgi:list commands are gone anyway
and I think that is good as our new commands focus on resources like
bundle or service.
Christian
Am 02.12.2011 14:27, schrieb Glen Mazza:
Oh, thanks for the tutorial, I was unaware of the "export" and "ls"
commands. LSNED I guess.
Anyway, question, as a result of your proposal, when I enter "list"
at the Karaf command prompt -- what will I receive, what you're
proposing to rename bundles:list (what we presently see by default),
or this new services:list?
Also, shouldn't this services:list *replace* the osgi:ls command, so
we're not maintaining two very similar commands (as it looks like the
former will sufficiently handle what the latter does)?
Thanks,
Glen
--
Glen Mazza
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com
blog: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza
