Hi Dan,

Guillaume made a first change on trunk around that.

So it will includes in the branch.

I plan to include sub-shell and profiles too on this branch.

Regards
JB

On 01/16/2012 04:31 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Saturday, January 14, 2012 9:19:53 AM David Jencks wrote:
We've been feature complete since last august, except everyone keeps
deciding we need more features.  I think Andreas's point is that unless we
decide that we're going to do a release we'll never run out of essential
features that absolutely need to be in 3.0 before we can release it.

What specific features do you need in 3.0 that aren't there right now?

Is Guillaume's activator stuff ready/in there?   That would be the main thing
I'd like to see included at this point.

Dan




anyway +1 from me.

thanks
david jencks

On Jan 14, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Basically this is a good idea. I am just unsure if we are already at the
point where we should do the branch. Do we have all features necessary
for 3.0 finished? I think we should do the branch as soon as we are
feature complete. So the branch really can focus on stabilizing things.

Christian

Am 14.01.2012 16:40, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
Hey guys,

As all of you know we really want to get Karaf 3.0 out now for some
time. But as long we add new "groundbreaking" features to the master
we'll always destabilize it at some point. To give us a chance to
finally stabilize the entire thing and getting out a 3.0 release I
would like to propose a feature freeze for 3.0 starting (for example)
today in a week. Pack everything into trunk you already have and
really want to be part of Karaf 3. Then we'll cut off a new branch
(karaf-3.0.x) where we do not allow any new features. The version on
the master/trunk will be increased to 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT. This should be
the place then for all new features. This step should free us from
new regressions and give us the time to finalize 3.0.0.

WDYT?

Kind regards,
Andreas

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to