Andreas' latest update to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1207 indicates that 2.4.0 may work for us, in which case http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-353 could be closed as 'won't fix' (or the like).
Cheers, Jamie On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Guys, >> >> @Karaf we're currently using Pax Exam 2.3.0 and experienced PAXEXAM-351 >> [1] as we've upgraded the guava lib for all Karaf projects to it's latest >> version (KARAF-1207 [2]). With version 2.4.0 not available right now (and >> with no final release date) I've created a new v2.3.x branch on pax-exam >> and backported PAXEXAM-351 [1] there. Using this patch fixes our problems. >> >> I will like to release Pax Exam 2.3.1 on monday/thuesday with this patch. >> Though there had been various other bugfixes on master (well, at least I >> assume that those had been bugfixes by reading the issues and the >> changesets :-)). I'm not quite sure which ones though. @Harald and/or Toni: >> do you consider any of them critical for backporting to 2.3.1? If not I'll >> simply release with the single fix; though I think it's a good time to >> stabilze 2.3.x with what we've learned during the 2.4.x development. >> >> > Is 2.4.0 not an option for you ? With exam being "tool" that is usually not > shipped with other product releases i'd like the single, forward going > release line. I am not into that 2.4.0 line, so need to wait for Haralds > comments here. > @Karaf: Is 2.4.0.RC1 okay for you - feature wise ? > > > > > >> Kind regards, >> Andreas >> >> [1] >> http://team.ops4j.org/browse/**PAXEXAM-351<http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-351> >> [2] >> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/KARAF-1207<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1207> >> > > > > -- > Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com>
