I'm fine with a 2.3.0 branch also,
this way we can upgrade this branch to pax-web 1.1.2 which already
contains lots of improvements.
regards, Achim
Am 06.04.2012 10:18, schrieb Guillaume Nodet:
I do work on a daily basis on a private branch based on karaf 2.2.x, but
it's a bit more than that, it contains a few things like osgi 4.3,
integration with the new smx specs etc... I don't have any problem waiting
more, but I'm felling that's a disservice to the community because I hold
back things that some people actually need.
I know the argument for rushing 3.0 out and focusing on it, but I don't
have much time to do that myself and more importantly, that's not what I
really need, so I don't think I can devote much time on it.
Anyway, if people want me to delete that branch, I don't have any problem,
but I don't really think this is the real problem.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch.
I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch only
once Karaf 3.0.0 is out.
Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ?
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
- Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer& PMC
- OPS4J Pax Web<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer&
Project Lead
- Blog<http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
