I haven't had a lot of time to look at karaf recently but I really thought I left it so that the build worked in one step, and for this reason I did NOT use the new packagings in the build but instead used pom packaging and explicitly called out the mojos that the packaging uses. This is infuriating from the perspective of wanting to use our own capabilities but I think necessary for a reasonable release process.
david jencks On May 23, 2012, at 7:20 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 04:04:05 PM Christian Schneider wrote: >> I agree. We should redcommend the packaging feature for our end users >> but not use it in our own build. > > With the caveat that it would good to have an it test or similar that uses > the plugin like that to make sure it works properly. That would be via the > maven invoker stuff and thus not subject to the problematic constraints. > :-) > > Dan > > >> So we have a simple build and people have the convenience of the plugin. >> >> Christian >> >> Am 23.05.2012 15:54, schrieb Guillaume Nodet: >>> Right, I agree, we could just change the way the assembly is build and >>> not use our own plugin to simplify the build. >>> What I meant was I don't think we really want to rework the plugin to >>> get rid of the new packaging. > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >
