Thanks for the explanations.

I don´t think I can address these concerns while keeping the original idea of using features like the startup.properties. So I closed the issue as wont fix.

Christian

Am 25.05.2012 17:34, schrieb Guillaume Nodet:
David said he didn't want xml processing in the bootstrap.  This
clearly has not been addressed.
Andreas said there's no value in your change because the file is now
fully generated.  This hasn't been addressed.
I said only supporting a subset of features schema is a problem.  This
hasn't been addressed.

I may have missed something.  But when people disagree, letting time
pass does not usually change things.
AFAIK, those concerns has been raised on the patch you uploaded, so
there's something wrong here.

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Christian Schneider
<[email protected]>  wrote:
I thought we had settled all these concerns.
So what are the concerns regarding the commit that make you -1 it?

During the discussion there were some concerns but I think my implementation
should have addressed all concerns. I created an issue and put up a patch.
This was available for 4 days now. Besides you no one else took the time to
review the patch.

So from your review you wrote you were concernd that the implementation does
not implement all features of the feature file and people might want more.
Does this really warrant a -1 ?

Christian

Am 25.05.2012 17:08, schrieb Guillaume Nodet:

Can you please revert.  I think 3 people expressed concerns with the
patch, so i'm officially -1 it until this concerns have been fully
addressed and we've reached a consensus.

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Christian Schneider
<[email protected]>    wrote:
I have now committed the patch. So you should be able to test from trunk
now.


Christian

Am 23.05.2012 17:44, schrieb Andrei Pozolotin:
     Christian:


     I am curious

     1) are your changes are in current karaf 3 snapshot?

     2) do you have example/test project that shows how to build
     karaf distro w/o startup.properties, with minimal feature=framework
     only?

     3) or is the idea discarded?

     Thank you,

     Andrei

--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com



--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com





--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to