+1 on the 2.4.x comment - we really should make creating branches a
more common event than it's been on the 2.2.x series.

Cheers,
Jamie

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm the third one backing Guillaume here. I've a strong negative
> feeling about changing behavior in micro releases if it's not a VERY
> critical bug. PPL adapt to the behavior and will become "afraid" of
> upgrading micro releases, although they definitely should do so to
> become the latest bug-fixes and get the security holes stuffed. But,
> since we've messed up this "concept" about 1k times for the 2.2.x
> branch anyhow I don't consider it a show stopper now; nevertheless we
> really should learn from this and do better for 2.3.x; I think this
> also includes opening 2.4.x the moment 2.3.0 is released to make sure
> that ppl have a place to include features/improvements and are not
> tempted to include them into micros; but this is a different story :-)
>
> Independently I've tested the latest release (src builds, notice
> checks, my applications, ...) and it looks really good to me.
>
> --> all in all +1 (binding) for the release.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com> 
> wrote:
>> I second Guillaume here, we should be real careful not to add so much
>> behavioral changes.
>>
>> regarding the release: +1
>>
>> regards, Achim
>>
>> 2012/6/25 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>:
>>> Same feeling here, though I think we should learn from that and be
>>> more vigilant about not introducing new features or behavioral changes
>>> in micro releases, that should have been done in 2.3.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Ioannis Canellos <ioca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Ideally, a micro release should guarantee forward and backward
>>>> compatibility.
>>>>
>>>> I'd say though that the particular issue doesn't sound like a show stopper
>>>> to me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Ioannis Canellos*
>>>> *
>>>> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>>>> **
>>>> Twitter: iocanel
>>>> *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> FuseSource, Integration everywhere
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> Committer & Project Lead
>> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
>> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
>> Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Reply via email to