It's what I have in mind. Currently, org.apache.karaf.shell is "server" oriented as it contains the SSHD port for instance. So it makes sense to rename it as org.apache.karaf.sshd IMHO.

Regards
JB

On 07/05/2012 05:47 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
I think that depends if we want to split the shell.ssh module into
command and server. If we split it then sshd.cfg is perfect for the server.

Christian


Am 05.07.2012 13:44, schrieb [email protected]:
I think that org.apache.karaf.sshd is a better name.

Regards
JB

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://wwx.talend.com

----- Reply message -----
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: [discuss] Changing the org.apache.karaf.shell.cfg into
org.apache.karaf.ssh.cfg
Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2012 12:21 pm


+1 of course only on trunk for 3.0.

Regards
JB

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://wwx.talend.com

----- Reply message -----
From: "Christian Schneider" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [discuss] Changing the org.apache.karaf.shell.cfg into
org.apache.karaf.ssh.cfg
Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2012 11:06 am


Hi all,

I think the config pid for the ssh command and server is a bit
misleading.
It is called org.apache.karaf.shell which I do not immediately connect
to ssh. It also only contains settings for ssh and not the shell in
general.

So I propose we change this pid to org.apache.karaf.ssh for karaf 3.

Christian




--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com


Reply via email to