Yes, let's wait for JB's healthy return before we hold the call. Hope you feel better soon JB!
Cheers, Jamie On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey JB, > > first of all get better soon. And of course this call can wait till you're > back > and Healthy again. > > Regards, Achim > > 2012/7/16 Brian Topping <[email protected]>: >> Hope you are feeling better soon, JB!! >> >> Brian >> >> On Jul 15, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I'm again at the hospital (same issue as 2 weeks ago), this time to perform >>> deeper investigation. >>> The doctor request me to rest one week. >>> >>> So for the Second Birthday Concall, I let you decide: >>> - you can maintain the call without me >>> - we postpone one week more >>> >>> Sorry again for that. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 07/13/2012 03:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>> FYI, >>>> >>>> I created the wiki page about the Karaf Second Birthday Meeting: >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Apache+Karaf+Second+Birthday+Meeting+%282012-07-16%29 >>>> >>>> >>>> I will make a test with Google Hangout. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 07/13/2012 03:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>> The Aries API modules have been module. >>>>> >>>>> I pinged Guillaume and Dan to get the info when the other Aries modules >>>>> will be released. >>>>> >>>>> In the mean time, I'm tackling Pax Url (1.4.3) and "my" issues ;) >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 07/13/2012 03:26 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote: >>>>>> Well, then once Aries is out we can go (finaly) for a 3.0.0 vote! >>>>>> Hurray :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>> Andreas >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Christian Schneider >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> From my point of view it is mainly the SNAPSHOTS we use. Mostly >>>>>>> everything >>>>>>> else can be delayed. I am simply working on features till we are ready. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 13.07.2012 13:02, schrieb Andreas Pieber: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, issues are going up and down for the 3.x release since weeks now; >>>>>>>> the interesting question: what is really missing (from a feature point >>>>>>>> of view) for 3.0? Couldn't we delay them for 3.1/4.0? I still think >>>>>>>> that 3.0 is such a big change that we should rather bring it out >>>>>>>> slowly instead of pushing an even larger feature amount into it; don't >>>>>>>> you think? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>> Andreas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Christian Schneider >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 3/ Karaf 3.0.0RC1 >>>>>>>>>>> Currently, we have mainly two blocking issue for this first RC >>>>>>>>>>> release: >>>>>>>>>>> - we have to update to Aries 1.0.0 (instead of SNAPSHOT as we have >>>>>>>>>>> currently) >>>>>>>>>>> - the source distribution is missing >>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on the source distribution and I raised the Jira >>>>>>>>>>> about the >>>>>>>>>>> Aries >>>>>>>>>>> modules update. >>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to gear up the Aries update in order to cut off a >>>>>>>>>>> first RC >>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>> (as it is currently). It would be great to be able to cut off the >>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>> end of this week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 here too, just to make clear, we're talking about the first >>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>> candidate and not a "real" RC1 release, are we? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>>>> Andreas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If we say a release candidate should be functionally complete and >>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>> may >>>>>>>>> need some bugfixes then I agree we should not yet do a RC1. >>>>>>>>> What we could do though is have a milestone release like M1. With the >>>>>>>>> aries >>>>>>>>> release in that could be a nice point in time to do so. >>>>>>>>> I just looked into the Karaf 3 deps. The only remaining SNAPSHOT dep >>>>>>>>> beside >>>>>>>>> Aries is pax url maven. I am quite sure we can release that in time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then after the M1 release we should discuss what needs to go into >>>>>>>>> Karaf 3 >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> be ready for a RC1. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Christian Schneider >>>>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Open Source Architect >>>>>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Christian Schneider >>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Open Source Architect >>>>>>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > Committer & Project Lead > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin > <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project > Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
